PROJECT 09Intermediate
Profit and Loss Analysis
Business scenario
The CFO needs a management P&L pack for 2025 with margins and budget variance explained, ready for the board.
Problem statement
Build the P&L structure (Revenue → Gross Profit → EBITDA → EBIT → Net Profit) monthly for 2025 vs budget and 2024, and explain the main movements.
Learning objectives
- Structure a P&L from line items
- Compute margins and variances correctly
- Explain drivers of profit change
Instructions
Line classes in pnl_monthly: revenue, cogs, opex, da, interest, tax. Gross profit = revenue − cogs. EBITDA = gross profit − opex. EBIT = EBITDA − D&A. Net profit = EBIT − interest − tax. Favourable variance convention must handle costs (lower cost = favourable).
Tasks
- Monthly and full-year P&L 2025, 2024 and budget 2025.
- Gross, EBITDA and net margin %.
- Budget variance by line with favourable/unfavourable flags.
- YoY profit bridge (revenue, gross margin %, opex, D&A, interest, tax).
- Board commentary: three key messages.
Deliverables
- Excel P&L pack
- Commentary
Evaluation rubric
| Criterion | Weight | Excellent | Proficient | Developing | Insufficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P&L structure | 25% | All subtotals and margins correct. | Correct and complete with minor gaps in rigour or presentation. | Partly correct; important steps missing, unvalidated or unclear. | Missing, incorrect, or not supported by the data. |
| Variance logic | 20% | Cost/revenue sign conventions correct. | Correct and complete with minor gaps in rigour or presentation. | Partly correct; important steps missing, unvalidated or unclear. | Missing, incorrect, or not supported by the data. |
| Profit bridge | 15% | Bridge reconciles. | Correct and complete with minor gaps in rigour or presentation. | Partly correct; important steps missing, unvalidated or unclear. | Missing, incorrect, or not supported by the data. |
| Interpretation & recommendations | 25% | Clear, quantified conclusions tied to the business question, with limitations stated. | Correct and complete with minor gaps in rigour or presentation. | Partly correct; important steps missing, unvalidated or unclear. | Missing, incorrect, or not supported by the data. |
| Presentation | 15% | Concise, well-labelled outputs a manager can act on without explanation. | Correct and complete with minor gaps in rigour or presentation. | Partly correct; important steps missing, unvalidated or unclear. | Missing, incorrect, or not supported by the data. |